2005 stanford commencement addressread supplymental materials W r i t i n g

2005 stanford commencement addressread supplymental materials W r i t i n g

Write a Rhetorical Analysis on this topic:

Steve Jobs’ 2005 Stanford Commencement Address

Read Supplymental Materials before you start to write:

Analyzing Your Audience and Purpose

Thinking Rhetorically About Good Writing


Make sure you satisfy the Grading Criteria below:

Rhetorical Analysis

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

5.0 pts

Analysis

Specific, developed analysis and insightful observation.

4.0 pts

Analysis

Analysis is generally sound but could be more specific or insightful in some areas.

3.0 pts

Analysis

General and/or undeveloped analysis

2.0 pts

Analysis

Analysis is sparse and lacks insight.

1.0 pts

Analysis

No relevant analysis or insightful observation made.

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Details

5.0 pts

Full Marks

5.0 pts

Supporting Details

Support information is related to analysis and supports the topic/subject.

4.0 pts

Supporting Details

Support information has minor weakness relative to analysis and/or support of the topic/subject.

3.0 pts

Supporting Details

Support information has major weakness relative to analysis and/or support of the topic/subject.

2.0 pts

Supporting Details

An attempt has been made to add support information, but it is unrelated or confusing.

1.0 pts

Supporting Details

Support information is irrelevant or not found.

0.0 pts

No Marks

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus

4.0 pts

Focus

Exhibit no lapses in focus on topic/subject.

3.0 pts

Focus

Exhibit minor lapses in focus on topic/subject.

2.0 pts

Focus

Exhibit major lapses in focus on topic/subject.

1.0 pts

Focus

Fail to establish focus on topic/subject.

0.5 pts

Focus

No analytical focus found.

0.0 pts

No Marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Fluency

4.0 pts

Full Marks

4.0 pts

Writing Fluency

Demonstrate skillful writing fluency, exhibit few or no mechanical errors

3.0 pts

Writing Fluency

Demonstrate reasonable writing fluency, exhibit few mechanical errors.

2.0 pts

Writing Fluency

Writing fluency is lacking, exhibit several mechanical errors.

1.0 pts

Writing Fluency

Demonstrate minimal writing fluency, exhibit numerous mechanical errors.

0.5 pts

Writing Fluency

Writing is not fluent—unreadable.

0.0 pts

No Marks

4.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat

2.0 pts

Format

Sources are cited correctly in the document and on the reference page.

1.5 pts

Format

Sources are cited, but there are a few errors in the format.

1.0 pts

Format

Sources are cited, but there are several errors in the format.

0.5 pts

Format

Some of the sources are not cited and/or the format is not correct

0.0 pts

Format

Sources are not cited at all.

0.0 pts

No Marks

2.0 pts

Total Points: 20.0