30 pts full marks 0 pts W r i t i n g
COMPLETE CASE 3-5: WALMART INVENTORY SHRINKAGE.
Read the case and write an executive summary on the case, including answers to the following questions.
- What are the ethical issues in this case, and who is being affected?
- What would you do in this situation?
- Do you think what Shane did was whistleblowing? Explain what is meant by whistleblowing?
See the Grading Rubric for Case Study Report and the Assignment Papers section in the Syllabus/Course-Specific Requirements for formatting requirements and the grading rubric for this assignment.
Do not forget to submit your assignment.
RUBRIC
Case Study Assignment Rubric (2)
|
Case Study Assignment Rubric (2) |
||||
|
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocumentation & formatting A quality paper will include a proper title page and references (as noted above). |
|
5 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization & cohesiveness A quality paper will include an introduction stating the purpose/intent of the paper (5%). The body of the paper will be derived from the assignment itself, and it will be properly subdivided into sections based upon what the paper must address (5%). In a quality paper, the conclusion will summarize the previously presented content (5%). |
|
10 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEditing A quality paper will be free of any spelling, punctuation, or grammatical errors. Sentences and paragraphs will be clear, concise, and factually correct. |
|
5 pts |
||
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent A quality paper will have significant scope and depth of analysis/research to support any statements. Relevant illustration or examples are encouraged. A quality paper will employ sound use of reasoning and logic to reinforce conclusions, and opinions must be supported. |
|
30 pts |
||
|
Total Points: 50 |
||||
